Regulation, Governance and Carbon Emissions: Some Global Lessons
datasetposted on 15.04.2020 by Weimin Jiang, Leizhen Zang, Jiajing Sun, Michael Cole
Datasets usually provide raw data for analysis. This raw data often comes in spreadsheet form, but can be any collection of data, on which analysis can be performed.
Abstract: How regulation affects environmental protection has generated much attention amongst scholars. However, studies have generated inconsistent results, due to the narrow focus on one particular country/region and or an inconsistent definition of regulation. This study analyzed panel data obtained from World Bank and the Quality of Government Institute (QoG) for 1996 to 2014 timeframe and used regulatory quality data from the World Bank. We contrasted different countries according to their stage of economic development, political regimes and attitude towards the Kyoto Protocol. The findings supported the Environment Kuznets Curve (EKC) that economic growth facilitates carbon reduction. Regulatory quality appears to have significant effects on reducing carbon emissions, having an inverted ‘U’ shaped curve for democracies and a ‘U’ shaped curve for authoritarian states. Enthusiasm for Kyoto Protocol had significant effects on carbon emissions through both committing to Kyoto protocol initially and compliance through ratification. Data Description: Our variables are obtained from the authoritative sources, for example World Development Indicators were taken from the World Bank and data on regimes from the Quality of Government (QoG) Institute. We measured regulatory quality through the World Bank’s Regulatory Quality Index, which captures perceptions of government capacity ‘to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development.’ Data (kg per 2010 US$ of GDP) from the World Bank was used as the main measure for carbon emissions. Heterogeneity amongst countries necessitated control variables, choice reflecting usage in previous studies. First, we incorporated the GDP annual percentage growth rate, reflective of findings that economic growth raises carbon emissions. The stage of economic development, measured by per capita GDP, was also included, reflective of the EKC-concept that as countries shift from middle to high-income status economic growth starts to facilitate carbon emission reductions. Industrialization, measured by ‘Industry (including construction), value added (% of GDP)’ and urbanization, measured by ‘Urban population (% of total)’, were included to reflect consensus that industrialization and urbanization raise carbon emissions. The percentage of the land area allocated to forests, the percentage of electricity generated from fossil fuels and the percentage of renewable energy consumption were included to reflect the effect of energy structure on carbon emissions. Finally, an education measure, the number of years of secondary schooling, was incorporated to reflect observed connections between educational attainment and carbon emissions. Contact Email: email@example.com